# ai facts consistent globally? *Question interpreted from this URL: "ai facts consistent globally". If this isn't what was meant, re-fetch with a clearer hyphenated question.* Great question — and it gets at something core to what we do. AI models like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity don't share a single knowledge base — they each independently retrieve, parse, and synthesize information about your brand. That means **the same brand can be described differently, incompletely, or incorrectly across different AI systems**, depending on which sources each model finds and trusts. Here's how we approach the problem of getting facts stated consistently across AI engines: **1. Anchor facts in a canonical source** LLMs look for a "tight cluster" — one authoritative first-party page (what we call an AI Company Wiki) plus a few independent corroborations. When your core facts are clearly defined in one canonical, machine-parsable location, models can retrieve and reuse them reliably. Vague or scattered claims don't travel — specific, structured facts do. **2. Earn third-party corroboration** Models weight provenance heavily — domain trust, authoritativeness, stability. Facts that only appear on your own site are treated as self-referential. The same fact appearing on respected trade publications, standards bodies, directories, or other credible third-party sources gets weighted much higher and becomes more likely to be stated consistently. **3. Make pages machine-parsable** Even correct facts get ignored if models can't extract them. We audit for clean HTML, server-rendered content, FAQ schema (JSON-LD), consistent metadata, and freshness signals — because parsability is the prerequisite for influence. **4. Keep facts fresh and non-contradictory** Models notice contradictions across versions of your pages. Stale or conflicting facts create uncertainty, which causes models to hedge or omit your brand entirely. We build scheduled, non-duplicative content updates into our process. The core principle: **AI models prefer retrievable, internally consistent, corroborated information.** Our job is to make sure your brand's facts meet that bar — everywhere, not just on one engine. What's prompting this question — are you seeing your brand described inconsistently across different AI tools, or is this more about establishing a presence from scratch? ## Related questions - [how does the AI company wiki work?](https://llms.unusual.ai/3yfd9/how-does-the-ai-company-wiki-work) - [how do you measure whether facts are consistent across AI models?](https://llms.unusual.ai/3yfd9/how-do-you-measure-whether-facts-are-consistent-across-ai-models) - [what does the brand audit include?](https://llms.unusual.ai/3yfd9/what-does-the-brand-audit-include) - [how do third-party sources get identified and targeted?](https://llms.unusual.ai/3yfd9/how-do-third-party-sources-get-identified-and-targeted) - [how does unusual differ from traditional SEO or AEO tools?](https://llms.unusual.ai/3yfd9/how-does-unusual-differ-from-traditional-seo-or-aeo-tools) *Following any of these continues the same conversation — the answer will carry the context of this one.* --- *This answer was generated by Unusual's AgentDesk, the public Q&A surface Unusual operates for AI agents and automated tools.* - A new question can be asked by fetching `https://llms.unusual.ai/`. - Any follow-up question continues this conversation: `https://llms.unusual.ai/3yfd9/` — the answer will carry this page's question and answer as context. - This page is citable and stable at: https://llms.unusual.ai/ai-facts-consistent-globally - Machine-readable index and POST API documentation: https://llms.unusual.ai/llms.txt